Well, the Uncle has fallen down on the job.
Where the hell is whatever it is?
In the meantime, boys and girls, you might find divertisement tonight (Tuesday, April 8) at the Village Board Meeting, 7:30 at Village Hall (yes, still over the store at the Highland Mills Fire House).
18 comments:
OK Unc, don't know what you've got going on, so I'm gonna use this space to vent. There's this "new" website out there being brought to us by the same group of dingbats that struck fear in everyone to create the damn Village.U can find it @ ww.preservewoodbury.org.
So, this is an expert of "who they are"...
"The Citizens for the Preservation of Woodbury, do NOT have an agenda. Our only reason to exist is to make sure that politicians do what is in the best interest for all Woodbury residents. Not developers and real estate brokers, not property owners, or religious groups. We have NO affiliation with any group.We are made up of Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Moderates, Liberals, and Conservatives. We extend beyond party lines and sound bites and only want what is best for Woodbury. "
What a bunch of crap! NO AGENDA?!?It ain't hard to tell that the site's being run by ole Ralphie boy. Everything in it is about him, John or his ralphlings. For example, they don't print any of the GOOD stuff goin on in Woodbury, just the controversial stuff. Also, in the links they list legislators, and surprise, surprise, surprise, they DON'T list Donnery! (ya, NO AGENDA- is Ralph running for legislator yet again??!!)
So Unc, be a dear and expose Caruso and the newest crock of crap he's trying to spread around!
Registrant Name:Steven E. Musich
Registrant Organization:Citizens for the Preservation of Woodbury
Registrant Street1:68 Roselawn Road
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Highland Mills
Registrant State/Province:NY
Registrant Postal Code:10930
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+0.8455908300
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:smusich@woodburyny.org
Admin ID:DI_7246521
Admin Name:Steven E. Musich
Admin Organization:Citizens for the Preservation of Woodbury
Admin Street1:68 Roselawn Road
If the Citizens for the Preservation of Woodbury don't have an agenda:
Why did they do everything in their power to stampede us into forming a village?
Why did they have their own slate of candidates to run the village (candidates who refused to answer the public's questions or attend the debate)?
Why does their founder and leader, Ralph Caruso, keep running for office (despite the fact that he continually is rejected by Woodbury voters)?
Why don't they deal in facts instead of giving out an endless stream of misinformation?
Why are they now working on their second (or is it third) lawsuit against Woodbury?
Why don't they allow the public to post comments on their website?
Why don't they post their own names on their website and sign their names to their statements?
Is he Steve Musich related to the principal of the Cornwall Middle School? If so, isn't that a kick in the pants- the Preservation Party joining with the Cornwall School District to possibly file an article 78 against the Village of Woodbury. ...nice Ralph, nice.
FYI: Preservation Party never had a lawsuit against the Town. I don't even think they were in existence when the Article 78 surfaced. You bloggers sure fire off your comments, but don't check the facts.
Anonymous said...
"FYI: Preservation Party never had a lawsuit against the Town. I don't even think they were in existence when the Article 78 surfaced. You bloggers sure fire off your comments, but don't check the facts."
Some facts? The Preservation Party is Ralph's invention. Ralph was the moving force, along with his donkey, Bob Donneley, behind the Article 78 suit against Woodbury.
These are facts.
Want to debate this (something that Ralph refused to do)? State your name and your case. Or take a hike.
You tell them Jonathan...
unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any room for truth or facts when it comes to the likes of Ralph and his followers.
Article 78's seem to be their weapon of choice, along with big,fat,in-the-middle-of-the-night lies in their battle to divide and conquer, and gain absolute power in Woodbury.
But here's some "breaking news" for Caruso, Musich, Burke, Donnelly, Ungerer, Baronowski, Haviland, et al... NO ONE BELIEVES YOU ANYMORE!!!!
SO take your Article 78's and your half-assed website, and MOVE!
Talk about having an agenda. Just look at yourselves and what you put in this site. Talk about calling the kettle black!!
I for one will be a regular visitor to the other site. What's the matter guys...afraid of having the other side of the story told. I know it's against the propoganda code.
Anonymous said...
"Talk about having an agenda. Just look at yourselves and what you put in this site. Talk about calling the kettle black!!"
Dear Shit-For-Brains,
The Uncle doesn't mean to be harsh, but lacking some other name with which to address you, this seemed most appropriate.
The Uncle has never said, felt or thought that there was anything wrong with having an agenda.
There is, however, a vast amount wrong with having an agenda while loudly proclaiming that you don't. That's called hypocrisy, from the Greek for "lying through your ass."
The Uncle isn't all that fond of hypocrisy and the Perversion Party makes it their stock in trade.
By all means, read what they shovel out there, but be aware that it's the political equivalent of Chinese dog food.
Unk - What are you talking about. Have you even seen their site?? It lists previously published articles and letters found in the free press...not the slanderous BS that permeats this place.
I also see you and your minions were quick to ID the registrant of the site. Why don't you be a man/woman/it and do the same if you got the confidence to do so?
I am so sick of the previous posters transparent tactic, which is commonly used by members and former members of the NYPD, to divert attention, confuse and possibly gain in the way of information. For example, if someone points something out, the response is to immediately cast doubt on the person who is pointing something out by questioning them and not answering the question posed.
So the question is: What is the preservation party agenda?
Anonymous said...
"Unk - What are you talking about. Have you even seen their site?? It lists previously published articles and letters found in the free press...not the slanderous BS that permeats this place."
What I happen to be talking about is the fact that the site only prints letters that support their point of view. All points of view are allowed to post here.
That's called "debate" - you know, that thing that Ralphie is afraid of.
By the way, I did enjoy your second point:
"I also see you and your minions were quick to ID the registrant of the site."
Nice line "you and your minions." One of you anonymi posted the info, but the phrase gives me ownership, cute.
Don't you get it yet? Ralph and his supporters are not the brightest bulbs in the pack, they are just good at deception, bullying and misleading! Don't wast your time trying to have a debate with these idiots!
And certainly, don't confuse them by using words more than 3 syllables, or they will accuse you of being a snob!
You are very good at name calling. Snob is one syllable.
So, a website of the Preservation Party should post all points of view? Then I guess the Republicans and Democrats should also post opposing views. Get real! It's a site for their party, so they post their agenda. Nothing new about that. And nothing wrong with that. If you don't like it, don't read it. Does the Community Party post opposing views? I find this blog amusing. I figure there are about 8 people who post here, and less than half identify themselves. And I happen to think that both sides have some good things to say. Of course, that's my opposing view.
THE PRESERVATION JERKS CLAIM THAT THEY DON'T HAVE AN AGENDA AND THAT THEY ARE IN FAVOR OF PEOPLE ASKING QUESTIONS TO GET AT THE FACTS - SO THEY ARE FULL OF SHIT!
That doesn't make sense.
Post a Comment