Photo News
Friday, June 02, 2006
To the editor:
The notice that appeared in the May 19th edition of The Photo News under “Out & About” listed a tag sale as CThis was incorrectly titled.We are just citizens working together to raise funds to support a law suit brought against the Town of Woodbury in reaction to zoning changes approved by the Town Board that created high density housing zoning.The tag sale was correctly titled in the May 20th edition of the Times Herald-Record’s garage sale section as “Highland Mills Tag Sale/Fundraiser - Everything Goes.”I hope this clarifies any misconceptions.
Thank you.
Donald Siebold
Highland Mills
Gee Donnie, where did that name, Woodbury Action Committee (or WAC), come from? Did the Photo News make it up? Or did you WAC jobs realize that you would have to file info on the committee and decide that that required a little more information coming to light than you folks were comfortable with?
Also, the flyers that you put all over Woodbury seemed to leave out that the tag sale was a fund-raiser for the law suit against the town. Just an oversight, I'm sure.
Finally, how many times are you going to trot out the "high density" bullshit? How come you never say that the projects you are suing over have 1 acre and 2 acre zoning?
Try tackling those misconceptions you lying sack of (ahem)...you silly fellow.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
If these people are fundraising dont they have to report this to someone like the Board of Elections? How do we know how the money of the people being duped in to attending these tag sales is being spent.
How do we know the money is going to the lawsuit and not for lets say a brain for Donnie, a heart for Caruso or to buy some courage for the rest of the mind numb robots who follow them.
And, if at the Tag Sale "Everything Must Go" why then are these people still here??
Bob Donnelly is going to use his share for a pair of ruby slippers that he fell in love with at Kohl's.
And as to your last point, and a damned fine point it is, the Uncle would like to serenade the WAC jobs with a few choruses of "How Can I Miss You If You Won't Go Away?"
C'mon U.B. let's keep the debate honest. The WP3 property was down zoned to 1 acre so that coupled with the clustering it would yield 1/4 acre zoning.
Just to clear up any misconceptions.
This question is for Desiree, if you're reading this...did Mr. Seibold buy a permit for his tag sale?
Yes he did
Post a Comment