Friday, June 01, 2007

Larkin vs Caruso


You may recall that Ralph Caruso insisted that State Law did not demand a disbandment of Woodbury's fire district if a village was created.

You might further recall that at the forum that the Fire Company had at the Union Hall just before the vote on forming a village, the attorney who specialized in fire districts disputed this, but that Caruso got up again and again to insist the fellow was wrong.

You may even recall that Caruso claimed later that the attorney came over to him after the meeting and admitted that Ralph was right (an impossibility in that the attorney left long before the meeting was over).

Well, as most of us knew Ralph was a) dead wrong, b) lying through his ass or c) both.

Now we hear from Ralph's boss, Senator Bill Larkin, who confirms it. Too bad Ralph never thought to ask Bill. But then, since when have facts had anything to do with what Ralph says?

Here's the whole article from the today's Photo News. You can read the whole thing or skip to the highlighted fun facts.

Village of Woodbury’s fiscal affairs come into focus
By Tony HoustonWoodbury — The new Village of Woodbury, created last August, got its financial affairs in order this April by adopting a $1.7 million general fund budget for the fiscal year that begins today.


Immediately upon passing the budget, however, the Village was faced with the problem of how fire protection, water and sewer service can be most efficiently and inexpensively provided to the Woodbury community.


Prior to the incorporation of the Village, these services were provided by the townwide Woodbury Fire District and Town of Woodbury water and sewer districts.


The fate of the Woodbury Fire District was debated two days before the vote to incorporate the Village. At that forum attorney Frank Simeone said village incorporation would mean that “the fire district would no longer exist and the board of fire commissioners would be replaced by the village government.”


He said: “On this matter, the state law is written in black and white.”


Ralph Caruso, chairman of Citizens for the Preservation of Woodbury, disagreed with Simeone at the forum. Caruso’s group had previously distributed a Town of Woodbury Preservation Kit that, among other items, stated that there would be no changes to the fire district as a result of village incorporation.


In a May 24 press release, state Sen. William J. Larkin Jr., R-C-Cornwall-on-Hudson, said: “When the Village was created, according to current village law, the fire district could no longer provide fire services.”


Larkin sponsored legislation (S.1481), which, he said, “simply allows the residents of Woodbury to continue to be protected by the Woodbury Fire District.”


That legislation passed the State Senate and was sent to the Assembly.


As for the Town of Woodbury water and sewer districts, existing state law requires that they be terminated this Dec. 31 and be taken over by the Village. This could be costly to Woodbury’s taxpayers because of the town’s union contracts. These agreements require the town to pay workers their accumulated vacation and sick time upon leaving town employment. Woodbury Town Supervisor John Burke estimates this amount at $215,000.


Larkin has an answer for that problem as well. He introduced legislation (S.5845) to allow the Town of Woodbury to continue to operate the existing water and sewer districts. That legislation has been sent to the Local Government Committees of both the State Senate and the Assembly.


“The Town and Village have approved an inter-municipal agreement transferring the districts and employees from the Town to the Village, and, if the legislation (S.5845) passes, from the Village to the Town,” said Village Trustee Neil Crouse in a recent telephone interview. “The Town and Village are both working cooperatively toward this special legislation.”


The rest of the governing of Woodbury is being sorted out with much less fanfare. The library, parks, police and highway department will remain the responsibility of the town. Planning, zoning and the building department are the responsibility of the Village — starting today.

I don't want to call Ralph Caruso a liar...oh, wait a sec, yes I do.

By the way, how many of you got Village Tax Bills for $58?

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

I say anyone who got a higher tax bill should go throw them on Ralph's yard!!

Uncle Betty said...

That wouldn't just be littering, it would cause a major fire hazard.

Anonymous said...

So when will the Almighty Caruso address his foible? Ever? He just goes on like he's made no mistakes and is the best thing since sliced bread! Why can't he be stopped? Is he a front for a greater evil?

Anonymous said...

I would like to hear from those "Ralph supporters" who love to throw thier garbage onto this blog. It's all coming to the surface now. Are you hiding ? Or is it just taking longer to make up your lies ? Of course this will be blamed on someone else. We're waiting. Your move.

Anonymous said...

Anyone know what happened at tonights Woodbury Democratic Committee meeting...committee was to endorse its slate.

Anonymous said...

They probably endorsed Ralph!

Anonymous said...

holy crap this site really stinks!!

Uncle Betty said...

Yes.
Is That a problem?

Anonymous said...

Hey Uncle,
How about some info about the joint Village of Woodbury & Village of Harriman meeting on June 26th? Something about the Nepera property being annexed into Harriman. What gives.....

Anonymous said...

With the apathy that seems to envelop residents of Woodbury at times, I doubt many will even show up...however they will be the loudest complainers if the property IS annexed and the consequences are negative.

It would be nice to see the ENTIRE Woodbury Town and Village boards show up to state their position (of course we would hope it would be a UNITED one at that), as well as a large showing of residents to support them. I understand that that if indeed annexed, Village of Harriman would be less likely to make environmentally friendly demands of the purchasers...in otherwords, since Harriman wants the NEPERA site back on their tax rolls, they may be more apt to approve a use that Woodbury might decline. (Isn't there currently a lawsuit regarding the responsibility for the clean-up of the site already pending?)

As a community that dogged NEPERA about health issues and environmental issues, we should ALL make the time to attend this most important meeting. What da ya say Woodbury????